Legal Opinion

Dunn v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 6, 1943No. 45711PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMaddeN, Judge

• The plaintiff, an individual, contracted with the Government to construct abutments, piers, and underpasses on certain United States highways in California. For excavation,, plaintiff was to be paid at specified rates per cubic yard. Paragraph 39 of the specifications, of the contract, quoted in finding 3, provided that, for purposes of payment for excavation, measurement would be made to side slopes of' one to one for common excavation and one quarter to one-for rock excavation:

Provided That, where the character of the material1, cut into is such that it can be trimmed to the required’…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hellander v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API