Legal Opinion
Caldwell v. George Sproull Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 13, 1935No. 5139PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TALIAFERRO, Judge.
Defendant is engaged in the manufacture and sale by wholesale and retail of paints, oils, varnishes, etc., and has been so engaged for some ten years. Its charter authorizes it so to do. The wholesale and retail store is located in the city of Shreveport, and eleven persons are required to conduct that line of its business. The manufacturing plant, or factory, is some three miles distant and only three persons are necessary to operate it. The personnel of the two businesses is entirely different. As the Shreveport store needs manufactured products to maintain its stock and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Shipp v. BordelonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Charity Hospital of Louisiana v. MorganLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
- Jackson v. YoungLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Adams v. Hicks Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
- Charity Hospital of Louisiana v. Board of School DirectorsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fields v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
- Caldwell v. George Sproull Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Fontenot v. MyersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- Speed v. PageLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
- Fields v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.