Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Young

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 2, 1927No. 2891PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Webb, J.,

recused.

ODOM, J. We find in the record the' written opinion of the district judge, in which we concur. We note that the district judge also wrote an opinion on the application for new trial. Both" of which we quote in full:

“This suit arises under the compensation law, and in plaintiff’s petition it is alleged that plaintiff was employed as a driver of teams for the partnership of Young & Whittington, that said Young & Whittington were working for the Palmer Corporation; that plaintiff while in actual .employment of said Young & Whittington and while stringing pipe for said…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shipp v. BordelonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. South Louisiana Land Co. v. Riggs Cypress Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  3. Helton v. Tall Timber Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  4. Durrett v. WoodsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  5. Jones v. Louisiana Oil Refining Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tregre v. KratzerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Sistrunk v. Audubon Park Natatorium, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Speed v. PageLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Caldwell v. George Sproull Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. Associated Pipe & Supply Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API