Legal Opinion

Charity Hospital of Louisiana v. Morgan

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 5, 1932No. 1046PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLe Blanc, J.

This suit is brought under the provisions of Act No. 126 of 1924, as amended by Act No. 29 of 1928, which authorizes the board of administrators of any state charity hospital to make appropriate charges for services rendered to any patient coming within the provisions of the Employers’ Liability Act, and¡ to hold the patient, his employer, and the compensation insurer or insurers of the employer, liable therefor, in- solido. The requirements of the act appear to have been complied with, and, upon the patient and his employer failing to pay the charges which are alleged to have been $158.50,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shipp v. BordelonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. White v. Equitable Real Estate Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Lay v. PughLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Jarrell v. EwingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Blane v. IglehartLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Coleman v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. McAllister v. Peoples Homestead & Savings Ass'nLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Caldwell v. George Sproull Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Hammer v. LazaroneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Rester v. Community Stores, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API