Poznanovic v. Maki
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
This is an action for a declaratory judgment to determine plaintiff’s right to levy on defendant’s automobile under an execution. The facts were stipulated to the effect that defendant is a farmer; that the automobile in question is a Buick coupé with a compartment built in the body; that defendant uses the automobile primarily for hauling his farm produce to town and bringing back groceries and supplies, for which purpose the compartment is highly useful; and that it is necessary for him to have and use the car in furtherance of his occupation of farming.
Exemption was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cahill v. EastmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- Funk v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Lames v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Cohen v. GouldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Allen v. CoatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- In Re TvetenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Panuska v. Johnson (In Re Johnson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1987
- ESTATE OF JONES BY BLUME v. KvammeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Medill v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.