Legal Opinion

Poznanovic v. Maki

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 7, 1941No. 32,844PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

This is an action for a declaratory judgment to determine plaintiff’s right to levy on defendant’s automobile under an execution. The facts were stipulated to the effect that defendant is a farmer; that the automobile in question is a Buick coupé with a compartment built in the body; that defendant uses the automobile primarily for hauling his farm produce to town and bringing back groceries and supplies, for which purpose the compartment is highly useful; and that it is necessary for him to have and use the car in furtherance of his occupation of farming.

Exemption was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cahill v. EastmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
  2. Funk v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. Lames v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Cohen v. GouldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. Allen v. CoatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. In Re TvetenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Panuska v. Johnson (In Re Johnson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1987
  4. ESTATE OF JONES BY BLUME v. KvammeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Medill v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API