Legal Opinion

Ridley v. Young

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 24, 1944No. Civ. 7023PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The defendant, William Young, also known as Joseph William Young, has appealed from a judgment which was rendered against him and his codefendants jointly and severally, for property damage and personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff as the result of an automobile collision.

William Young owned the auomobile which was involved in a head-on collision with plaintiff’s machine on the public highway near Roseville on the afternoon of August 3, 1941. The plaintiff’s machine was demolished and he received serious injuries. The defendant Dale Hastay was then driving William Young’s ear with his…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Boone v. LightnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Brownrigg v. DefreesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Hughes v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Mohn v. TingleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Krum v. MalloyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. AndayaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Hopkins v. AndayaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Barr v. CarrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Saari v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API