Legal Opinion
Chevrolet Motor Division v. New Motor Vehicle Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 25, 1983No. AO15529PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOTT, J.
This appeal is from a judgment granting a peremptory writ of mandamus, ordering that a decision of the state’s New Motor Vehicle Board (the Board) be set aside. Appellants are the Board, real party in interest 49er Chevrolet (49er), and two associations of car dealers, Northern California Motor Car Dealers Association, Inc. and Motor Car Dealers of Southern California, Inc. (Associations), who were granted leave to intervene below. Respondent is Chevrolet Motor Division, General Motors Corporation (Chevrolet).
I
The relevant facts are as follows. Chevrolet notified 49er, its…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Andrews v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- City of Walnut Creek v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- American Motors Sales Corp. v. NEW MOTOR VEH. BD.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Ford Motor Company v. PaceTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Today's Fresh Start, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Office of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. New Motor Vehicle BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Southern California Underground Contractors, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Gai v. City of SelmaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- British Motor Car Distributors, Ltd. v. New Motor Vehicle BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.