Legal Opinion
Askew v. City of Rome, GA Comm.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided November 14, 1997No. 96-8884PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Per curiam
The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the thorough Order (opinion) entered on June 25, 1996 and attached hereto as Exhibit A.
AFFIRMED.
ATTACHMENT
APPENDIX
United States District Court, Northern District of Georgia, Rome Division. Bonny L. Askew, et al., Plaintiffs, v. City of Rome, Georgia, et al., Defendants.
Civil Action 4:93-cv-28-HLM.
ORDER
This case came before the Court for a four day non-jury .trial on January 29. Plaintiffs contend that the Defendant City of Rome’s methods of electing its City Commission and Board of Education are intentionally…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Shaw v. RenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- North Carolina State Conference of NAACP v. McCroryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- Ruiz v. City of Santa MariaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- In re Flat Glass Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Earl Old Person v. Mike CooneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.