Legal Opinion
Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Frederick
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 14, 1966No. Civ. 29655PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoth, P. J.
This appeal from a declaratory judgment comes to us by way of an agreed statement pursuant to rule 6 (a) of the California Rules of Court. The essential facts are not in dispute.
Karl Frederick, Jr. (Frederick), appellant herein, owned a 1960 half-ton pickup truck, which was licensed as a eommer*778cial vehicle but which he used for personal purposes. He owned no other vehicle. He testified that the truck “was used . . . solely to drive to and from work, for camping trips and to carry [his] skindiving equipment. ’ ’ The truck was not used in his work.
On August 26, 1961, Frederick, being an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Atlantic National Insurance v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Colonial InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Poncino v. Sierra Nevada Life & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. JacoberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Schwalbe v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Farmers Ins. Exch. v. GeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- John Tenopir v. State Farm Mutual Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Lee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.