Globe Indemnity Co. v. Universal Underwriters Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.
As we point out later in more detail, the insurance carrier’s attempt here to escape liability for the loss accruing from the negligence of a permissive user must fail. The carrier cannot retreat into the restrictions of an asserted special condition because that condition depended for operative effect upon certification, and the policy was never certified. As of the date of the liability here, the provisions of the applicable financial responsibility laws were incorporated into the policy, and the insurance carrier must afford coverage to the full extent of its policy rather than only to the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Wildman v. Government Employees Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- American Automobile Insurance Co. v. Republic Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Whitley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. JacoberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Sandoval v. ChenowethArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Metz v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Company v. Mary Bakke, Johnny Bakke, Jo Lynn Wood, Karla Vigil and Lawrence VigilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.