Legal Opinion

Lee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1973PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAllister, j.

This is not a suit in equity as it is described by the parties, but a declaratory judgment proceeding to decide the rights of the plaintiff Loma Lee as the insured under a policy of liability insurance issued to her by the defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. We have uniformly held that such a proceeding is in the nature of an action at law and governed by the same rules. ①..However, since the proceeding involves only the construction of a contract as a question of law we are not hound by the finding of the trial court, but are free to decide the question de…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. May v. Chicago Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Cimarron Insurance v. Travelers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Bowsher v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Orange v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
  5. Chalmers v. OREGON AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Estate of Neal Ex Rel. Delgado v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. SevierOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Dowdy v. Allstate Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API