Legal Opinion
Peetz v. Industrial Commission
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided November 29, 1979No. 14567-PRPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYS, Justice.
The petitioner, Ronald J. Peetz (hereinafter referred to as petitioner or claimant), was injured in an accidental, shooting in the fall of 1977. Denied workmen’s compensation benefits, he appealed. The Court of Appeals set aside the award of noncompensation (1 CA-IC 2083, filed August 28,1979) and we granted the employer’s petition for review pursuant to 17A A.R.S., Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, rule 23. The opinion of the Court of Appeals is vacated.
The facts necessary for resolution of this matter are not in dispute. • Petitioner, at all times relevant hereto, has been…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Goodyear Aircraft Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Royall v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Goodyear Aircraft Corporation v. GilbertArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Ortega v. Ed Horrell & SonArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Gaumer v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Circle K Store 1131 v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Claim of Koerner v. Orangetown Police DepartmentNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- City of Phoenix v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Neel v. State Distributors, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- Estate of Sims v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.