Ortega v. Ed Horrell & Son
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LOCKWOOD, Justice.
Petitioner seeks by certiorari to review the lawfulness of an award of the Industrial Commission of Arizona, respondent herein, denying her any benefits under her Widow’s Claim for Compensation. At hearings before the Industrial Commission it appeared petitioner’s deceased husband was before his death, the ranch foreman for Ed Horrell & Son, also a respondent herein. It further appeared that on March 12, 1960, petitioner’s decedent and his brother-in-law Frank Lavin, who also worked for respondent Horrell, set out for Douglas in a car owned by Lavin’s brother. The purpose of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Simpkins v. State Banking DepartmentArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Sherrill & La Follette v. HerringArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- King v. Alabam's Freight Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by19 opinions
- Frederick v. Younger Van LinesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Wyoming State Treasurer Ex Rel. Workmen's Compensation Department v. BostonWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
- Phelps v. Positive Action Tool Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
- Fisher Contracting Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Pottinger v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.