Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Anthony Dejohn (02-3158) Christopher Harb (02-3175)

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 13, 2004No. 02-3158, 02-3175PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J., joined by Martin, J.,

RYAN, J. (p. 548-49), delivered a separate concurring opinion.

OPINION

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Codefendants Christopher Harb and Anthony DeJohn appeal from their convictions and sentences for conspiracy to distribute cocaine, conspiracy to distribute marijuana, and unlawful use of a communication facility (Harb); and conspiracy to distribute marijuana, possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, unlawful use of a communication facility, and being a felon in possession of a firearm (De-John). They each raise numerous assignments of error, of which the two most novel and meritorious are a…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Massaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. United States v. Yervin K. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. James Ronald HazelwoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. HynesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. George William Blood (04-5101) and Stephen L. Crittenden (04-5261)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Robert KochCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API