Legal Opinion
Walk v. S. C. Orbach Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 30, 1964No. 40726PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERRY, Justice.
This original proceeding is brought to review an order entered by the Industrial Court en banc affirming and adopting the trial judg-e’s order denying petitioner’s claim for compensation for the reason such claim did not arise out of the employment with the respondent.
The amended Form 3 set forth that while employed as a salesclerk by the respondent’s Penn Sqttare store, petitioner had sustained an acute lumbosacral sprain, sprained coccyx and possible bilateral femoral hernia arising out of and in the course of her employment with respondent. Injury was alleged to have…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Willis v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Skelly Oil Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gallimore v. Marilyn's ShoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Max E. Landry, Inc. v. TreadwaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Turner v. B Sew InnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Hegwood v. PittmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Jenkins v. WilsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.