Legal Opinion

Blair v. McQuary

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 10, 1917No. 20,663PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Dougias 'district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

The plaintiff, Hugh Blair, owner and holder of an ordinary promissory note for $250, brought this action to recover thereon against O. H. McQuary, jr., the maker, and against J. W. Junkins & Son, the payees and indorsers. It was indorsed thus:

“Waiving presentment, protest and notice.
“J'. W. Junkins & Son,
“J. W. Junkins.”

The district court sustained a demurrer to the answer of Junkins & Son and gave judgment on the pleadings. Junkins & Son appeal. Their answer in substance alleged that they had furnished McQuary certain materials of the value…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Patten v. GurneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1821
  2. Stevens v. InchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Tucker v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  4. Doolittle v. FerrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  5. Work Bros. & Co. v. McCoySupreme Court of Iowa · 1893

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Livingston v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  2. Dubbs v. HaworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. Downey v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. Blair v. McQuarySupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  5. Koury v. RapalinoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API