Blair v. McQuary
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Dougias 'district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dawson, J.:
The plaintiff, Hugh Blair, owner and holder of an ordinary promissory note for $250, brought this action to recover thereon against O. H. McQuary, jr., the maker, and against J. W. Junkins & Son, the payees and indorsers. It was indorsed thus:
“Waiving presentment, protest and notice.
“J'. W. Junkins & Son,
“J. W. Junkins.”
The district court sustained a demurrer to the answer of Junkins & Son and gave judgment on the pleadings. Junkins & Son appeal. Their answer in substance alleged that they had furnished McQuary certain materials of the value…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Patten v. GurneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1821
- Stevens v. InchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Tucker v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Doolittle v. FerrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
- Work Bros. & Co. v. McCoySupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
3Cited by8 opinions
- Livingston v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Dubbs v. HaworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
- Downey v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
- Blair v. McQuarySupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Koury v. RapalinoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.