Legal Opinion
Central Illinois Light Co. v. Consolidation Coal Co.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided December 30, 2002No. 01-1477PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MIHM, District Judge.
Before the Court are two motions for summary judgment — one filed by Consolidation Coal Company (Consol) and one filed by Central Illinois Light Company (CILCO). For the following reasons, Con-sol’s Motion for Summary Judgment [# 14] is GRANTED, and CILCO’s Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Issue of the Statute of Frauds [# 29] is DENIED.
Background
CILCO is an electric utility. Its Edwards Generating Station is a coal-fired power plant. Consol, a subsidiary of CONSOL Energy Inc., is a coal mining company. It has an underground mine in southern Illinois…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Donald C. Hedberg v. Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- James L. Cain v. Michael P. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wyoming Board of Land Commissioners v. Antelope Coal Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- International Casings Group, Inc. v. Premium Standard Farms, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2005
- Roger Edwards, LLC. v. Fiddes & Son, Ltd.District Court, D. Maine · 2003
- Amedisys, Inc. v. JP Morgan Chase Manhattan Bank (In Re National Century Financial Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004
- Central IL Light Co v. Consol Coal CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003