O'Neil v. O'Neil
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order denying a motion for a change of the place of trial, in the Twelfth District Court, City and County of San Francisco. Daikgekfield, J. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Department No. 1, McKee, J.:
The action in this case was commenced in the Nineteenth District Court of the City and County of San Francisco, against two defendants, for the purpose of having determined a right claimed by the plaintiff to certain real estate situated partly in Sacramento County and partly in Sutter County. The case is, therefore, one of the class of cases mentioned in § 392 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Service of summons was had upon one of the defendants, who appeared and answered the complaint. Ten months afterward, service was had upon the other defendant, who appeared,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sailly v. HuttonNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- Welling v. SweetNew York Supreme Court · 1845
3Cited by15 opinions
- Warner v. WarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- McKenzie v. BarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Pieper v. Centinela Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- Pittman v. CarstenbrookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- San Jose Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.