Merrill v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
Defendant appeals from his conviction by the Court for sale of a controlled substance and resultant 5 year sentence. We affirm.
Initially defendant challenges the information as fatally defective because it fails to state into which schedule the controlled substance belongs. The information charged an unlawful sale of a controlled substance “to wit: methylenedioxy-amphet-amine.” The test of the sufficiency of an information is whether it states the essential elements of the offense charged, adequately notifies defendant of the charge against him and constitutes a bar to further…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. RoseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- State v. SmartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- State v. BridgesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- State v. WeinzerlMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. DevineMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
- State v. DownsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- State v. UmfleetMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- State v. WadeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.