Legal Opinion

State v. Devine

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1977No. 37778PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUNN, Judge.

Defendant-appellant was charged in an amended information with selling pentobar-bital, a Schedule II controlled substance, in violation of § 195.020 RSMo 1969. A jury found him guilty and set his sentence at five years imprisonment. Judgment and sentence were entered in accordance with the jury verdict. On appeal, defendant raises a multitude of allegations of error, including illegal entrapment. As we find as a matter of law that defendant was improperly entrapped into committing the offense charged, we discuss only that issue.

Before reaching the merits of the appeal we rule on…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Masciale v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. WillisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. State v. HortonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. State v. HinkleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Merrill v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API