Legal Opinion

State v. Weinzerl

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 1973No. KCD26038PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHANGLER, Judge.

Defendant was convicted by a jury upon two indictments which charged sales of hallucinogenic drugs. Defendant offered no evidence but elected to stand on his motion, denied by the court, for judgment of acquittal at the close of the state’s case. The state’s evidence proved conclusively that the sales had been set up by an informer and made by defendant to an undercover police agent. The court submitted the issue of entrapment to the jury. Defendant contends that the court should have declared entrapment as a matter of law and adjudged his acquittal because the state failed to…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. WillisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. State v. OvermannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. State v. DevineMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. State v. DayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. State v. HortonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API