Legal Opinion
State v. Addington
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 16, 1882PublishedCited by 18 opinions
Appeal from the St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction, Cady, J.
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The defendant, a wholesale grocery broker in the city of St. Louis, was tried in the court of Criminal Correction, on *215information charging him with the misdemeanor of selling an article of food known as “ oleomargerine,” or “ suine,” contrary to the following statute : —
“An act to prevent the Manufacture and Sale of Oleaginous Substances, or Compounds of the same, in Imitation of the Pure Dairy products. Sect. 1. Whoever manufactures, out of any oleaginous substances, or any compounds of the same, other than that produced from unadulterated milk or cream from same, any article designed to…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Welton v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- County of Mobile v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Thurlow v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Leep v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
- Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Commonwealth v. HuntleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Butler v. Marshall ChambersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Poole & Creber Market Co. v. BreshearsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.