Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Huntley

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 7, 1892PublishedCited by 39 opinions

The first case was a complaint to the Municipal Court of Boston, alleging that the defendants exposed for sale oleomargarine contrary to the provisions of the St. of 1891, c. 58. Trial in the Superior Court, on appeal, before Sherman, J., who, after a verdict for the Commonwealth, reported the case for the determination of this court.

Read the full summary

The first case was a complaint to the Municipal Court of Boston, alleging that the defendants exposed for sale oleomargarine contrary to the provisions of the St. of 1891, c. 58. Trial in the Superior Court, on appeal, before Sherman, J., who, after a verdict for the Commonwealth, reported the case for the determination of this court. The second case was a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, after the petitioner had been convicted in the Municipal Court of Boston of a sale of oleomargarine, had been sentenced to pay a fine and to stand committed until the sentence had been performed, and…

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

These cases arise under St. 1891, c. 58, entitled, “An Act to prevent deception in the manufacture and sale of imitation butter.”

In the first case, the defendants were convicted in the Superior Court of making a sale of oleomargarine at retail, not in the original unbroken package in which it was brought into this State; and the justice who presided at the trial reported the case to this court.

In the second case, the petitioner was convicted in the Municipal Court of Boston of making a sale of oleomargarine, and was sentenced to pay a fine, and to stand committed until the sentence should be…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  4. Ex Parte SieboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Cooley v. Board of Wardens of Port of Philadelphia Ex Rel. Soc. for Relief of Distressed PilotsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Graham & Foster v. GoodcellSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Plumley v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Marshal House, Inc. v. Rent Control Board of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  4. Coffee-Rich, Inc. v. Commissioner of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  5. John P. Squire & Co. v. TellierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API