Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Kendall

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1942No. Civ. 6695PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HELD, J. pro tem.

There is here an appeal from an order refusing appellant’s petition for letters of administration, from an order refusing to vacate the order just referred to, from the findings of fact, and from an order refusing to vacate an order denying appellant’s application for substitution of parties.

Orders appealable in probate are those designated in section 1240, Probate Code. That section, taken with subdivision 3, section 963, Code Civ. Proc., determines the right of appeal in probate matters. (Estate of Olmstead, 216 Cal. 585 [15 Pac. (2d) 495]; Estate of O’Dea, 15 Cal. (2d) 637…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Estate of O'DeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Lawson v. GuildCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Muchenberger v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Foster v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. In Re the Estate of EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Efron v. KalmanovitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Gosney v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Brice v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Vai v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Lundblade v. PhoenixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API