Saunders v. City of Little Rock
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Conley Byrd, Justice.
Appellants, Arthur B. Saunders, et al appeal from an order of the circuit court upholding the annexation of 55 square miles of territory to the City of Little Rock. Appellants, while conceding that a portion of the 55 square miles is subject to annexation, contend that some five to ten thousand acres of mining lands and some 12 square miles of flood lands do not qualify for annexation to the City of Little Rock within the meaning of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 19-307.1 (Supp. 1975), which provides:
“Any municipality may by vote of two-thirds of the total number of members making up…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vestal v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
- City of Olivette v. GraelerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Waldrop v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- City of Little Rock v. FindleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
- Parrish v. City of RussellvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Holmes v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Lee v. City of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Jackson v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Holmes v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Holmes v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.