Legal Opinion

Holmes v. City of Little Rock

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 25, 1985No. 84-266Published

1Opinion of the Court

686 S.W.2d 425 (1985)

285 Ark. 296

Roy L. HOLMES, Appellant,

v.

CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, et al., Appellees.

No. 84-266.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

March 25, 1985.

Rehearing Denied April 29, 1985.

Givens & Buzbee, Little Rock, for appellant.

Carolyn B. Witherspoon, Acting City Atty. by Victra Fewell, Asst. City Atty., Little Rock, for appellees.

DUDLEY, Justice.

The Board of Directors of the City of Little Rock adopted an ordinance which proposed the annexation of fifteen separate tracts of land, designated "A" through "O." An election was held, and the vote was in favor of the annexation, both in the City…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Vestal v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  2. City of Piggott v. EblenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  3. Holmes v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  4. City of Crossett v. AnthonySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  5. Brown v. Peach OrchardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API