Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

A. F. Arnold & Co. v. Pacific Professional Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 12, 1972No. Civ. 39343PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COLE, J. *

Plaintiff corporation appeals from a judgment entered against it after demurrers to its first amended complaint were sustained without leave to amend.

Reference is hereafter to plaintiff’s first amended complaint. Plaintiff alleged that it conducted a business as a surplus line broker and general agent; that since 1962 it had obtained for the Stacker Foundation, doing business as Bon-Air Hospital, liability, comprehensive hospital and malpractice insurance; that it had spent much time, money and effort in developing, servicing and maintaining the account; that its insurance…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. American Well Works Company v. Layne and Bowler CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Chicago Title Insurance v. Great Western Financial Corp.California Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Diodes, Inc. v. FranzenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Della Penna v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Forro Precision, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Lowell v. Mother's Cake & Cookie Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API