Legal Opinion

Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. v. Dillingham Corp.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1984No. 9057PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

NAKAMURA, J.

The issue is whether the conveyance of a lease by the Dillingham Corporation (Dillingham or the corporation) to Ala Moana Hawaii Properties (Ala Moana), a limited partnership whose limited partners are the corporation’s stockholders, was an “assignment” for purposes of Paragraph 15(a) of the lease agreement between Dillingham and the Maui Land and Pineapple Company, Inc. (Maui Land). The Circuit Court of the Second Circuit held that the transfer, effected as part of a plan to liquidate Dillingham’s commercial real estate operating assets in Hawaii,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hulsman v. Hemmeter Development Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Lemle v. BreedenHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
  3. First Ins. Co. of Hawaii v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Abraham v. S. E. Onorato GaragesHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Technicolor, Inc. v. TraegerHawaii Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hillis Motors, Inc. v. Hawaii Automobile Dealers' Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. Brown v. KFC National Management Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Cho Mark Oriental Food v. K & K InternationalHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Aickin v. Ocean View Investments Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1997

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API