Legal Opinion
Hillis Motors, Inc. v. Hawaii Automobile Dealers' Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 28, 1993No. 91-16325PublishedCited by 183 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
In this case we review a district court’s entry of summary judgment in an antitrust suit on the basis of the plaintiffs’ lack of standing. Because we conclude that appellant Hillis Motors, Inc., has standing to bring this action, we reverse.
1. BACKGROUND
In June 1984 Hillis Motors, Inc., an automobile dealership, voluntarily filed a petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. Because of misconduct by Hillis’ previous management, a trustee was appointed to conduct the corporation’s affairs. One year later an Amended Plan of Reorganization, which had…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by183 opinions
- Cooper v. PickettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- California v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability Litigation)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Eskanos & Adler, P.C. v. Somkiat G. LeetienCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Sternberg v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Boucher v. ShawCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.