Legal Opinion

Coe v. Wager

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1879PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Wayne. Assumpsit on the common counts and special contract. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

This suit was originally brought before a justice upon the common counts, and on a special contract whereby Coe, the defendant below, leased a farm which he owned to Wager and one William Otto, on the terms that Wager should have one-third of all the products and stock with some named exceptions,— the breach being a refusal to allow Wager to have his share, and an appropriation of it.

The case set up on the trial was for services of Wager in person and with his team during the winter and spring of 1877 from February 10 to April 1. In February, as he testified, he made a contract with Coe for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. St. Jude's Church v. Van DenbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Loomis v. O'NealMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Covel v. TurnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. McLaughlin v. SalleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  5. In Re Spenger EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API