Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. Salley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1881PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Wayne. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Marston, O. J.

Salley brought suit in justice’s court, declared upon the common counts and filed a bill of particulars. After judgment the case was appealed to the circuit, where judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant now asks for a reversal because of two alleged errors.

The plaintiff gave evidence tending to show possession of a farm belonging to the defendant under a lease, which was subsequently cancelled, that after the lease was cancelled the defendant told the plaintiff to go and put in fall wheat upon the farm, and that when harvested, he (plaintiff) should…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lenox v. FullerMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Watson v. SteverMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Coe v. WagerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Tolan v. HodgeboomMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Minneapolis Iron Store Co. v. BranumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Tuttle v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Aldine Manufacturing Co. v. BarnardMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Loomis v. O'NealMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Reed v. McRillNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API