Legal Opinion

Covel v. Turner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1889PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Osceola. (Judkins, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

It was said by this Court in Coe v. Wager, 42 Mich. 51 (3 N. W. Rep. 249), that—

■“No one is bound to pay for volunteered services rendered under circumstances which do not fairly indicate an expectation of reward.”

And, where the facts are undisputed, whether a contract for employment is made out or not is for the court.

The plaintiff at the time this suit was tried was 76 years old. He claimed that the defendant owed him for *409work and labor rendered from time to time during two years or more, under the following circumstances: Defendant was engaged in the business of keeping a livery stable at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coe v. WagerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carlson v. KrantzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. McCain v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Hollister v. Kinyon's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. In Re Spenger EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Spadoni v. GiacomazziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API