Legal Opinion

Gear Grinding MacHine Co. v. Stuber

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1937No. Docket No. 76, Calendar No. 39,709PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtjtzel, J.

In 1928, Alfred Rzeppa secured a patent for an improvement in a constant velocity universal joint, and entered into a license agreement with plaintiff whereby it became entitled to the use of the patent and all improvements in universal joints thereafter invented by Rzeppa. He also became associated with plaintiff for the purpose of developing and perfecting the universal joint so that plaintiff might commercially produce it. Rzeppa later was granted additional patents for universal joints on applications filed by Mm in August, 1929, and June, 1933. After taking out Ms first patent Rzeppa bad…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Solomons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Dalzell v. Dueber Watch Case Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Standard Parts Co. v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Hapgood v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Clark Thread Co. v. Willimantic Linen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National Development Co. v. GrayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Gerald Banks and Kelly Banks v. Unisys Corporation and Burroughs Corporation,defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  3. A & C ENGINEERING CO. v. AtherholtMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Bump Pump Co. v. Waukesha Foundry Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Bandag, Incorporated v. MoreningsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API