Gerald Banks and Kelly Banks v. Unisys Corporation and Burroughs Corporation,defendants-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, Chief Judge.
Gerald Banks appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, holding on summary judgment that there was an implied-in-fact contract to assign inventive rights from Banks to Unisys Corporation and Burroughs Corporation (together, “Unisys”). See Banks v. Unisys Corp., No. 96-CV-70869 (E.D. Mich. June 3, 1999). Because the district court erred by concluding that Banks failed to raise a genuine issue as to any material fact, we vacate and remand.
Background
In late 1986, a headhunter recruited Banks, an expert in optical engineering,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- McV Inc. v. King-Seeley Thermos CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- J. Michael Teets, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Chromalloy Gas Turbine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Kaempe, Staffan v. Myers, GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Farmers Edge Inc. v. Farmobile, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- James v. J2 Cloud Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Breed v. Hughes Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Building Innovation Industries, L.L.C. v. OnkenDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.