Legal Opinion
Hawes v. Chua
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 29, 2001No. 99-CV-1028PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, Associate Judge:
In this medical malpractice action relating to the fetal death of twins, the jury returned a verdict for appellees Maureen Chua, M.D., Maureen Chua, M.D., P.C., and Carin Kleiman, M.D. Appellants Trizah Hawes and Derrick Hawes filed a timely appeal, alleging several trial court errors, including the failure of the trial judge to strike the standard of care testimony of defense witness, Dr. Charles F. Hill, Jr. We affirm the judgment of the trial court and conclude, in part, that the trial court did not commit manifest error in admitting Dr. Hill’s national standard of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. Martinez-SalazarSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Morrison v. MacNamaraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- In Re MeltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Washington v. Washington Hospital CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Meek v. ShepardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Silvia Font de Bardón v. Mini-Warehouse Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2010
- Kansas Medical Mutual Insurance v. SvatySupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Hill v. Medlantic Health Care GroupDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Convit v. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Strickland v. PinderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.