Legal Opinion
Convit v. Wilson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 17, 2009No. 07-CV-585, 07-CV-646, 07-CV-671PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, Associate Judge:
This is a medical malpractice action in which Eileen and Frederick Wilson, husband and wife, filed a two-count complaint against Dr. John Barrett, and against appellants/cross-appellees, Washington Brain & Spine Institute, P.C. (“WBSI”) (Dr. Bar rett’s employer) and Dr. Rafael Jacinto Convit. Mr. Wilson alleged that Dr. Barrett and Dr. Convit’s negligent treatment and care caused him to suffer severe and permanent neurologic injuries. 1 Mrs. Wilson claimed loss of consortium. Prior to trial, Mrs. Wilson entered into a settlement agreement (only with Dr. Barrett)…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- McDermott, Inc. v. AmClydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cartel Capital Corp. v. Fireco of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- McKenna v. AustinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- President & Directors of Georgetown College v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Washington v. Washington Hospital CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Abshure v. Methodist Healthcare-Memphis HospitalsTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- Phillips v. MabusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Stevens v. Sodexo, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Glenn v. Union Pacific RailroadWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
- Paul Casey v. McDonalds CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.