Legal Opinion
Curtis v. Housing Authority of the City of Oakland
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 5, 1990No. C-89-1851 EFLPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
LYNCH, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are tenants in federally assisted public housing projects for low income tenants, owned and operated by defendant Housing Authority of the City of Oakland (hereinafter “OHA”), 1 a public housing authority operating under the United States Housing Act of 1937 (hereinafter "the Act”). 42 U.S.C. §§ 1437, et seq. In 1981, OHA adopted a policy discontinuing the provision of stoves to new tenants under the age of 62, continuing maintenance of stoves for existing tenants only for the useful lives of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Wright v. City of Roanoke Redevelopment & Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Chemical Manufacturers Ass'n v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Braxton-Secret v. A.H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Ashton v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Simmons v. Charleston Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995
- Crochet v. Housing Authority Of The City Of TampaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Velez v. CisnerosDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Crochet v. Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994