Legal Opinion

Housing Authority & Urban Redevelopment Agency v. Taylor

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 26, 2002PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

ZAZZALI, J.

In this appeal, we consider 42 U.S.C.A. § 1437a(a)(1) (Brooke Amendment), which limits the amount of rent that public housing tenants can be charged. The question before us is whether the Brooke Amendment prohibits a public housing authority (PHA) from assessing tenants attorneys’ fees, late charges, and court costs in an eviction proceeding where the express language of the lease defines such fees as “additional rent.”

The Housing Authority and Urban Redevelopment Agency of the City of Atlantic City (Housing Authority) instituted a sum mary…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Wright v. City of Roanoke Redevelopment & Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Free v. BlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sager v. Housing CommissionDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
  2. Green v. Morgan PropertiesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  3. Hodges v. Sasil Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  4. Sudersan v. RoyalNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  5. Sager v. Housing CommissionDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API