Legal Opinion

Pedro v. County of Humboldt

California Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1933No. Docket No. Sac. 4588PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant County of Humboldt from a judgment against it in an action to enforce the terms of a certain deed accepted by the county from the plaintiff’s grantor, and for damages.

In November, 1921, Elizabeth Marks was the owner of a ranch in Humboldt County comprising upwards of 240 acres, consisting of some timbered areas and some low reclaimed marsh-land used for agricultural purposes. On the fifteenth day of that month she executed and delivered to the County of Humboldt, and the county accepted from her, a deed to a 40-foot strip for road purposes running along the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sacramento Suburan Fruit Lands Co. v. WhaleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. Hill v. City of OxnardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Lyford v. North Pacific Coast RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Flying Diamond Oil Corp. v. Newton Sheep Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Marshall v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Cooper v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Dillard v. County of KernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API