Mueller v. Silver Fleet Trucking Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
Defendants contend that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the jury’s finding as to the negligence of the driver of the truck. We have carefully reviewed the evidence and are of the opinion that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the jury’s findings. Kagel knew that Mueller was on the inside of the hopper, room. He knew that the grates were not intended to hold a weight of eleven and a quarter tons; he had carefully avoided backing the truck onto the grates on previous deliveries and was well acquainted with the entire situation. Some attempt is made to excuse Kagel on the ground…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schulz v. General Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Pollard v. TobinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Cameron v. Union Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Erikson v. Wisconsin Hydro-Electric Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Potter v. PotterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- McCart v. MuirSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- Kleibrink v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1978
- Grant v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
- Chang v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- Olson v. HartwigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.