Legal Opinion

Asheville Mall, Inc. v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 16, 1985No. 8428SC1114PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

The issue before us is whether the trial judge erred in refusing to admit parol evidence offered by plaintiff to explain the terms of the lease. The question to be determined in the trial court was whether the north wall was included in defendant’s lease. The relevant sections of the contract are as follows:

Tenant’s Right to Make Alterations

Art. 8. The Landlord agrees that the Tenant may at its own expense, from time to time during the term hereof, make such alterations, additions and changes, structural or otherwise, in and to the demised premises as it finds necessary or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Root v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Adder v. Holman & Moody, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Silver v. North Carolina Board of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Renfro v. MeachamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Brokers, Inc. v. High Point City Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Williams v. HabulCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  2. Grich v. Mantelco, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Estate of James H. Waters, Jr., Deceased William Roger Waters and John B. McMillan Co-Executors v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  4. IRT Property Co. v. Papagayo, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Development Enterprises of Raleigh v. OrtizCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API