Legal Opinion
Russell v. Wells Fargo and Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 17, 2009No. C 07-3993 CWPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ CROSS-MOTION
CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Monte Russell and Daniel Freedman and Defendants Wells Fargo and Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. dispute how to calculate overtime pay when an employer violates the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-19, by improperly classifying employees as exempt and failing to pay overtime compensation. The parties stipulated to raise three legal issues in their cross-motions for partial summary judgment. The National…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Betty Black v. SettlePou, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Urnikis-Negro v. American Family Property ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- O'Neill v. Mermaid Touring Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Ahle v. Veracity Research Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- Wills v. Radioshack Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.