Legal Opinion

United States v. Irving Kahn and Minnie Kahn

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 29, 1973No. 71-1931PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILEY, Circuit Judge.

The government has appealed1 from an order of a district judge suppressing as evidence conversations between Irving and Minnie Kahn, husband and wife, gathered from wiretaps authorized by a district judge’s order permitting interception of their telephone communications by virtue of the provisions of Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968.2 We affirm in part and reverse in part.

On March 20, 1970 the judge issued the wiretap order on application of the government, through a specially designated Assistant Attorney General, supported by an FBI…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Hawkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. United States v. KahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. AmmarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  3. Raymond J. Ryan and Helen Ryan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. Rogelio QuintanaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. Arturo Reyes Mendoza, June Bunch Mendoza, and Oscar Reyes MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API