Legal Opinion
United States v. Rogelio Quintana
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 26, 1975No. 71-1609 to 71-1611PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAY, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Leonides D. Suarez, Rogelio Quintana and Gilberto Alonso appeal from their convictions on various counts of narcotics offenses and conspiracy to distribute narcotics, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2; 21 U.S.C. § 174, and 26 U.S.C. § 4705(a). They were convicted by a jury in 1971 in the Northern District of Illinois, the Honorable Bernard M. Decker presiding. We affirm the judgments of conviction of Leonides Suarez and Gilberto Alonso. We reverse the judgment of conviction of Rogelio Quintana on the ground that there is insufficient evidence to sustain the…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- United States v. Mason Townsend, Luis E. Diaz, Orlando Nunez, Dorothy Taylor, Carlos Mejia, Joseph Angel Claudio, and Isabel MarquezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando EstevezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Roy L. Williams, Thomas F. O'malley, Andrew G. Massa, Joseph LombardoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Barry HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- United States v. ArmocidaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.