Legal Opinion

Foley v. Ham

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 1917No. 21,110PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Appeal.from Labette district court; Elmer C. Clark, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

P. T. Foley was arrested upon a charge of paying persons to work (and in some instances to vote) for the election of certain candidates for public office, such conduct' *67constituting a felony under the corrupt practices act. (Gen. Stat. 1915, §§ 4842, 4343.) A preliminary examination was held before a justice of the peace, by whom he was required to give bond to answer the charge. In thé district court the county attorney asked to be relieved from filing an information, for the reason, among others, that there was not sufficient evidence in…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Smith v. ParmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. State ex rel. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  4. State ex rel. Wood v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. State ex rel. McEntee v. BrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Kenyon v. City of ChicopeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. State v. FinchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  3. State v. GreenleeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  4. Orloff v. Los Angeles Turf Club, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1947
  5. State v. PruettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API