Legal Opinion
City of Canon City v. Cox
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 15, 1913No. 7256PublishedCited by 15 opinions
Appeal from Fremont District Court. — Hon. Charles Cavender, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert
Appellee, as plaintiff, commenced an action against the City of Canon City to recover damages sustained by *265the alleged negligence of the latter. The verdict and judgment were in her favor. The defendant appeals.
The first point made by counsel for appellant is that the preliminary notice of injury for which damages were claimed as required by section 6661, R. S. 1908, was not given the city. This section is as follows:
“No action for the recovery of compensation for personal injury or death against any city of the first or second class, or any town, on account of its negligence, shall be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barnes v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- City of Denver v. DunsmoreSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
- City of Denver v. HyattSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
- City of Denver v. SpencerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
- City of Denver v. RhodesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- City & County of Denver v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
- City of Kokomo v. LoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
- Warden v. City of GraftonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
- Alder v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1924
- Byrnes v. City of JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.