Legal Opinion
Alder v. Salt Lake City
Utah Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 1924No. 4172PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCheery, J.
This action is to recover damages for ^^rsonal injuries. A demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint was sustained, and the action was dismissed. The plaintiff appeals.
The facts pleaded in the complaint as the grounds of defendant’s liability are, in substance, that the defendant is a municipal corporation, and owns and maintains Liberty Park, a public park situated within the city; that on July 4, 1923, a pageant, for the entertainment of the public was presented at the park, under the supervision of the recreation director of the city; that for the occasion tiers of seats surrounding a £tage…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bolster v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Harper v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Kellar v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Board of Park Commissioner v. PrinzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- Emmons v. City of VirginiaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Condemarin v. University HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Mayor of Baltimore v. State Ex Rel. BluefordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
- Standiford v. Salt Lake City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
- DeBry v. NobleUtah Supreme Court · 1995
- Ramirez v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.