City of Denver v. Dunsmore
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from District Court of Arapahoe County. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Beck, O. J.
The principal question raised by the assignment of errors and discussed in the briefs of counsel for both parties, is, whether an implied liability rests upon municipal corporations proper, under the laws of this state, to keep in repair the streets and bridges within their corporate limits; and whether actions lie against them at the suits of individuals for special damages suffered in consequence of their neglect so to do.
It is conceded, that the legislature has not expressly-given such right of action, either by the general statute or by the special charter under which the city…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Conrad v. . the Trustees of the Village of IthacaNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- City of Detroit v. BlackebyMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. FranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Town of Waltham v. KemperIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- Jansen v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Smith v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
- Sutton v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. RyanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
- Evans v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
- Carson v. City of GeneseeIdaho Supreme Court · 1903
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.