Brown v. EI Dupont De Nemours & Co., Inc.
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
VEASEY, Chief Justice:
In this appeal, we hold that the statute of limitations for an alleged injury resulting from toxic exposure did not begin to run until the plaintiffs were on notice that the harmful effects of the toxic exposure were possibly caused by wrongful conduct. The infant victims in this case were born with eye conditions that their physicians originally believed were either genetic defects or natural occurrences. Years later, however, a medical expert linked the birth defects to prenatal exposure to a chemical produced by the defendant. It was not until then that the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Layton v. AllenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
- Isaacson, Stolper & Co. v. Artisan's Savings BankSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
- Ison v. EI DuPont De Nemours and Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1999
- Mastellone v. Argo Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1951
- Condon v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bailey v. KhourySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- Bowen v. EI DuPont De Nemours & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Brin v. S.E.W. InvestorsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Dabaldo v. URS Energy & ConstructionSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- Personalized User Model, LLP v. Google Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.