Legal Opinion
Dabaldo v. URS Energy & Construction
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided February 7, 2014No. 254, 2013PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice:
The plaintiffs-appellants, Paul Dabaldo, Jr. (“DaBaldo”) and Marlene DaBaldo, filed a complaint against nineteen defendants, including the defendant-appellee, URS Energy & Construction, f/k/a/ Washington Group International, as successor to Raytheon Constructors, f/k/a/ Catalytic, Inc. and Crane Co. (collectively the “Defendants”). The complaint alleged that DaBaldo developed “pulmonary asbestosis; asbestosis” as a result of exposure to asbestos and sought recovery for those alleged injuries. After the completion of discovery, the Defendants moved for summary judgment arguing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- GMG Capital Investments, LLC v. Athenian Venture Partners ISupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
- United Vanguard Fund, Inc. v. TakeCare, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- Sheppard v. A.C. & S. Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1985
- Motorola, Inc. v. Amkor Technology, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2004
- Keene Corporation v. SheppardSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hecksher v. Fairwinds Baptist Church, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- McCaffrey v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
- Bagwell v. BorgWarner Morse Tec, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2017
- Bagwell v. Borgwarner Morse Tec, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2017
- Blue Beach Bungalows DE, LLC v. The Delaware Department of Justice Consumer Protection UnitSuperior Court of Delaware · 2024
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.